I’ve been looking for the perfect solution to back up my life, basically all the files on my computer. I wanted something that was inexpensive, easy to use, and reliable. I was backing stuff up on CD, that got old fast. I tried DVDs, but I heard the dyes are unstable. Then I heard a suggestion of just saving it on hard drives. Ok, why not?
I bought one of these. The Seritek seemed like a good solution at the time. I was taking advantage of the speed and technology of SATA drives. Whenever I bought a new hard drive for my PowerMac, I could stick the old drive in a tray and use it in this enclosure. External SATA is nice, but it just doesn’t work like a Firewire drive. It didn’t take long before I got super annoyed by these stupid trays. I learned later that there were enclosures out there that don’t require trays. Cooldrives has a few, but I was told the fans would not turn off when the computer is put to sleep. Ditto for the Seritek. That was very annoying to me also. Drobo was another drive enclosure I considered and still am. But it does so much more which comes at a cost, a cost of half a G! This leads me to the Blac X (finally, huh?)
A couple of weeks ago, I was perusing my local Fry’s looking for some kind of hard drive solution. Something caught my eye: a tiny little black box with a picture of bare hard drive plugged into some kind of enclosure like a video game cartridge. Ooh, what’s this? It takes SATA drives, 2.5″ and 3.5″. Nice. USB? Rip off! How much was this badboy? $39.95. Ooh, maybe not a rip off. Is it any good? I pulled out my iPhone and quickly searched the web for reviews just like in the commercials. Ahh, here’s one.. skipped to the conclusion section. Thumbs up. It’s mine!
Part 2 here.
I’ve been looking for a portable camera that has the quality of a DSLR for about 25 years, I mean forever. Sure there are point and shoots that have 12 megapixels, but the quality isn’t the same. The pictures look noisy and soft. There is too much depth of field. And there just isn’t enough exposure latitude: too many blown out highlights and muddy shadows. Back in the day (I hate when people say that), when film was king you could get a point and shoot or a small rangefinder with a fantastic lens, and the images were indistinguishable from your $1500 pro-slr with equivalent focal length lens. It hasn’t gotten to that point yet with digital, I guess until now.
The Sigma DP1 is a point and shoot camera that uses the legendary (I think it’s legendary) APS-C size Foveon chip, the same one found in the Sigma SD14. What’s so great about Foveon? I’m glad I asked. It’s a type of imaging sensor that uses three layers of pixels, one for each primary color: red, green, and blue. The combination of these three primary colors then form the colors you see in the picture.This stacking results in higher resolution per pixel than a normal Bayer pattern. Ok, so what’s Bayer pattern? I’m glad I asked that too. Instead of the red, green, and blue pixels being stacked on top of each other, in a Bayer pattern they are placed beside each other and each of these subpixels count as part of the pixel count. So basically a 4 megapixel Foveon chip really is 4 megapixels. In a Bayer pattern 8 megapixel chip, it’s about 1/3 the size. Looking at an image from a Foveon chip is kind of a surreal experience. It just looks so sharp and it is just so detailed. You can literally have a strand of hair a pixel thin.
So this DSLR sized Foveon chip is built into a camera the size of a point and shoot. That is really cool! The main drawbacks that critics have pointed out is the slow non-zoomable 28mm (35mm equiv.) F4 lens and the lack of a built-in viewfinder. I don’t mind the focal length and you can use an optional auxiliary viewfinder that attaches to the hotshoe. It costs $899 retail $999 retail and $799 street which is only a couple hundred more than the Ricoh GR Digital II which uses a normal tiny sensor. The Sigma SD14 DSLR on other hand can be found for $599, but you still have to buy a lens. And of course it won’t be as pocketable.